Home / Destinations / San Francisco / Palace of Fine Arts

San Francisco · 3 min listen · 5 sources

Palace of Fine Arts

Quick answer

The Palace of Fine Arts was built for the 1915 Panama-Pacific International Exposition out of plaster and fibre over a wooden frame, designed by Bernard Maybeck to look like an abandoned classical ruin. It was meant to come down with the rest of the fair. Walter S. Johnson's $2 million gift in 1959 paid to recast it in concrete between 1964 and 1967.

Audio in production The script below is finished and sourced; the recording is queued. Guides that are already recorded are on the audio tours page. Hear a recorded guide →

Full transcript

Built to Be Temporary

In 1915 San Francisco threw itself a world's fair — the Panama-Pacific International Exposition — to celebrate the opening of the Panama Canal and, more importantly, to tell the world the city had come back from the 1906 earthquake. The fair covered this entire district. It ran for less than a year, and almost everything in it was designed to be demolished afterwards. That is why the Palace of Fine Arts was built out of plaster over a wooden frame, reinforced with burlap fibre. It looks like carved stone. It never was. The architect was Bernard Maybeck, and his charcoal sketch was accepted immediately, without argument, which almost never happens.

Sadness Modified by Beauty

What Maybeck designed was not a monument. It was a deliberate ruin — a Roman or Greek structure that had been abandoned, overgrown, and half forgotten, reflected in a lagoon. He said he wanted the feeling of, in his words, sadness modified by the feeling that beauty has a soothing influence. Look at the top of the colonnade and you will see the figures he used to get it: rows of women with their backs turned to you, heads bowed over the boxes they lean on. They are called the weeping women, sculpted by Ulric Ellerhusen, and their pose only makes sense from inside Maybeck's idea. They are mourning. Those boxes on the colonnade were meant to be planted, so that vines would spill down over the whole structure and finish the illusion. Maybeck's own wish was that the palace be allowed to decay, surrounded by redwoods, until it really was a ruin.

The City Said No

He got his wish for about fifty years, whether he wanted it or not. The fair ended, everything else came down, and the Palace stayed — slowly falling apart, put to use as a military storage depot, a Parks Department warehouse, a telephone book distribution center, and at one point temporary Fire Department headquarters. By the nineteen fifties the plaster was coming off in sheets. The argument over what to do with it was real, and demolition was on the table. Then in May 1959 a philanthropist named Walter S. Johnson announced $2 million to save it. Work began in 1964: the original was demolished and cast again in steel and concrete, this time permanently, and the rebuilt colonnade and rotunda were finished in 1967. So what you are looking at is a permanent reproduction of a temporary building imitating a ruin. And it works anyway. Come at dusk. The lighting is aimed at the colonnade, the swans are usually on the lagoon, and there are almost no crowds after dark.

The checkable facts

  • Designed by Bernard Maybeck for the 1915 Panama-Pacific International Exposition
  • Originally framed in wood and covered with staff, a mixture of plaster and burlap-type fibre
  • Maybeck described the effect as 'sadness modified by the feeling that beauty has a soothing influence'
  • Sculptures on the colonnade supplied by Ulric Ellerhusen

All the numbers, with sources →

After the guide

Practical bookings for this stop. These are affiliate links: they cost you nothing extra and they do not change what we recommend.

Hotels near this stop

Search stays nearby →

Data that works on landing

Get a local eSIM →

Frequently asked

Why does the Palace of Fine Arts look like a ruin?
Because Maybeck designed it that way. The brief was a quiet zone in the middle of a crowded fair, and what he drew was a classical structure that had been abandoned and half forgotten beside a lagoon. He described the effect he wanted as sadness modified by the feeling that beauty has a soothing influence.
Is the Palace of Fine Arts the original 1915 building?
No. The original was staff — plaster over a burlap-type fibre on a wooden frame, meant to be demolished with the rest of the fair. It was taken down and recast in steel and concrete between 1964 and 1967. What stands is a permanent reproduction of a temporary building imitating a ruin.
Who are the figures on top of the colonnade?
Sculptures by Ulric Ellerhusen, usually called the weeping women. They stand with their backs turned, heads bowed over boxes they lean on, and they are mourning — that is the whole point. The boxes were meant to be planted so vines would spill down and finish the illusion of abandonment.
Who saved the Palace of Fine Arts from demolition?
Walter S. Johnson, a businessman and philanthropist, who announced a $2 million gift in May 1959 towards rebuilding it in permanent materials. Demolition had been a live option: by the 1950s the plaster was coming off in sheets and the building had spent decades as warehouse space.
When is the best time to visit the Palace of Fine Arts?
Dusk. The lighting is aimed at the colonnade, the reflection in the lagoon does the work Maybeck intended, and the crowds thin out after dark. It is free, open, and never ticketed, so the only cost of coming at the right hour is the hour.

Sixty seconds costs nothing

Judge the writing and the voice before you spend anything.